Appreciative Inquiry Interviews: A Little Background
Appreciative Inquiry began in the 1980s, while David Cooperrider and Frank Barrett were conducting action research into an organization. According to Bushe (2013), discussions of the feedback weren’t going too well, and the participants were reacting in a hostile way to their questions.
This led Suresh Srivastva, their supervisor at the time, to suggest something interesting: What if the questions themselves were influencing the negative dynamic?
Indeed, when the researchers adapted their questions to have a more positive focus, they found things changed considerably—it was much easier to make positive change and improve things there. So while AI interview questions were originally intended to refine qualitative research methods, they also became the basis for an entire paradigm.
A question is only as good as the answer it evokes, and questions thus contribute to success or failure across different contexts.
(Serrat, 2009)
So…Who Does AI Interviewing?
In practice, anyone can do AI interviewing, if they have the right motivation and mindset. You can ask yourself AI questions to find out more about your own strengths and create sustainable changes in yourself, or a coach can ask you questions.
In organizations, everybody involved in an initiative will usually be familiarized with AI, as Appreciative Inquiry is largely about co-creation. External stakeholders can be included, too—one of the goals of the approach is to gather diverse perspectives.
Let’s look at how the goals of each stage differ throughout the 4D model.
A Brief Look at the Model
The 4D model is a visual representation of how Appreciative Inquiry plays out. There are 4 phases through which participants progress once they have selected an affirmative topic to focus on. However, defining the affirmative topic will often involve careful thought—as a facilitator, leader, or participant, the questions you ask during this process can also affect how ideas are framed (Ludema et al., 2006).
In-quire’ (kwir), v.,
1: the act of exploration and discovery.
2. To ask questions; to be open to seeing new potentials and possibilities.
Synonyms: DISCOVERY, SEARCH, and SYSTEMATIC EXPLORATION, STUDY.”
(AI Commons, 2019)
Four different phases make up the 4D model, these are Discovery, Dream, Design, and Destiny. Once an affirmative topic has been defined, the participant or participants will move through these in sequence.
Below is an overview of the different phases; the aims of each will shape the nature of questions that are most relevant. Throughout, I’ll also be highlighting just how and why Appreciative Inquiry is so closely linked with positive psychology.
Discovery Questions
The Discovery phase is about appreciating the positive core. During this phase, participants ask questions that explore and identify strengths—of a team, organization, group, or individual. AI is concerned with using strengths to grow, change, adapt, and improve, so the more diverse a group, the more ground can be covered in the metaphorical search (Lewis et al., 2016).
We can also think of Discovery questions by recalling that Appreciative Inquiry is born out of grounded theory, and is inherently a qualitative method, so subjectivity is implied (Collis & Hussey, 2013). In essence, it calls for the mindset that there are no right or wrong answers—our organizational realities are made up of the stories we tell ourselves and each other.
The more people we include, and the more we explore and discuss, the more likely we are to reach a shared understanding of the positive core. In research methods lingo, we will hardly reach theoretical saturation, but we can aspire to it (Collis & Hussey, 2013).
As Cooperrider and Godwin put it (2011), the overarching question in this phase is: “What gives life?”
Dream Questions
Picture a scenario where participants have come together, and we have been asking each other positive questions about things like our past achievements. A little further on, I’ll give specific Appreciative Inquiry interview questions, but for now, suffice to say we’ve been asking each other what made those successes possible.
Engaged and full of positive emotions (two elements of Seligman’s PERMA model, by the way), the next phase we move into is Dream. Our collective focus here is envisioning possibilities, thinking, and imagining (Cooperrider & Godwin, 2011; Whitney et al., 2004). In one sense, it’s practical and still focused on the past. In another, it expands on this with the aim of generating more from this.
Here, the goal is to envision what we want to happen—in contrast to some conventional practices like real options analysis, which can sometimes focus on ‘what if’ in a different way (Johnson et al., 2017). Rather, we ask questions about stories; then, we can ask questions of those stories to elicit more in the way of rich detail around themes. These may include dream dialogues, which look at building out aspirations and wishes about the shared future.
The overarching question of the Dream stage, is therefore:
“What might be?”
Design Questions
The Design stage is about building the visions and ideas with the greatest potential, together. In co-constructing ‘the ideal’, therefore, the questions become slightly more specific and focused on clarifying. To get from a dream of “super-enthusiastic customer service” to the concrete strategic focus, for instance, participants now ask positive, provocative questions.
These are aptly called ‘provocative propositions’, and they aim to create compelling, clear images of social architecture that could make the dreams possible (Whitney et al., 2002; Ludema et al., 2006). Provocative propositions use the present tense, so interview and probing questions should reflect this.
Encouraging provocative propositions and sharing requires a supportive environment that encourages and invites openness (Axtell et al., 2011; Ludema et al., 2006). In this sense, it calls for sensitivity to team relationships and healthy collaborative dynamics to get the best possible outcomes.
The overarching question of this phase is:
“What should be?”
Destiny Questions
We now ideally have images of a shared, positive future that leverages our organizational strengths. The Destiny stage is about encouraging shared commitment and discussing how teams and individuals will help bring provocative propositions to life. This can be seen as distinct from traditional approaches in its focus on collective meaningfulness and purpose.
The overarching question here, according to Cooperrider and Godwin (2011), is:
“How to empower, learn, and improvise?”
What our readers think
Thank you for the very useful article!
This article provides a comprehensive overview of Appreciative Inquiry interview questions and their relevance at different stages of the 4D model. It highlights the origin of Appreciative Inquiry and the positive impact of asking questions with a focus on strengths and possibilities. The article emphasizes the importance of designing effective questions that evoke rich and meaningful responses, and it offers various examples of Appreciative Inquiry interview questions for different contexts such as leadership, employee engagement, and team building. Overall, it serves as a valuable resource for understanding and implementing Appreciative Inquiry interview techniques.